
Fact API fundamentals: from claims to verifiable evidence
Understand what a fact API should return, where evidence fits, and how to design a response that can be inspected.
· 6 min read
Read the fieldnote10 FIELDNOTES / 4 PERSPECTIVES
Fieldnotes for people who build, check, and publish. Practical reading on factual APIs, AI answers, citations, and the evidence behind them.

Understand what a fact API should return, where evidence fits, and how to design a response that can be inspected.
· 6 min read
Read the fieldnoteALL FIELDNOTES

Match the exact claim, inspect the reasoning, and preserve dates and qualifications when using published fact checks.

Connect claims to passages before generation, then check that the final answer stays within the evidence.

A practical data model for claims, sources, evidence relationships, assessment history, and clearly defined uncertainty.

Design a source-monitoring process that turns scholarly updates into reviewable actions for dependent claims.

Compare evidence boundaries, evaluation results, privacy questions, review effort, and integration requirements.

Split complex text into checkable statements without losing the qualifiers, attribution, and context that change the question.

A journal-article review workflow for tracing claims to methods, results, versions, and appropriate qualifications.

Go beyond working links to inspect bibliographic identity, source passages, quotations, and the meaning of a citation.

Build a claim-level evaluation process that separates retrieval gaps, assessment errors, and missing evidence.

Understand what a fact API should return, where evidence fits, and how to design a response that can be inspected.
Go from a better question to a clearer evidence trail—one fieldnote at a time.