Use the guides. Keep the context.

Educational scope

FactAPI.com publishes independent educational material about factual APIs, evidence workflows, LLM evaluation, citations, and source monitoring. The site is a resource library, not a hosted verification service. No page should be interpreted as an offer of an API key, paid subscription, guaranteed response time, or automated certification of a statement.

The guidance is intended to help readers design and inspect an evidence process. It does not replace specialized professional advice, peer review, security review, or subject-matter judgment. Evaluate a proposed implementation against the requirements and consequences of your own application.

Examples and technical material

The downloadable JSON and schema files are illustrative and use fictional evidence. They are not results about real people, organizations, scientific findings, or commercial services. The interactive display switches between fixed examples and does not process a reader’s claim.

You may adapt the supplied example JSON and schema to discuss or prototype your own evidence workflow. Preserve a clear distinction between fictional sample data and real assessments. Validate structure, semantics, privacy, and operational behavior before applying an adapted contract in a production system.

External material and affiliations

External source links are provided for attribution and inspection. Their inclusion does not imply that FactAPI.com owns the external material or has a partnership with its publisher. Outside organizations’ names identify the sources discussed, not customers, sponsors, or endorsers of this site.

Follow the relevant publisher’s conditions when accessing or reusing its material. Public access to a page does not, by itself, describe every permission needed to reproduce its contents or build an automated integration. Verify current documentation rather than assuming an endpoint or capability exists.

Accuracy and changes

Sources, interfaces, and research interpretations can change. A guide should be read with its stated scope and supporting reference. A historical study is not a promise about a current model or product, and a clear explanation is not proof that a proposed implementation has been evaluated in every setting.

Report specific errors through the Contact page. Include the exact statement and a supporting reference so the issue can be examined. Read the editorial policy for the distinction between a source-backed assertion, an implementation suggestion, and a hypothetical example.

Contact

For questions about the site or use of its example files, email [email protected]. No transaction, account, or paid service is created by browsing the site or opening a local example.