A clearer source starts a better conversation.

Make the correction specific

For an editorial issue, include the page address, the exact statement, and the evidence that supports a correction. Tell us whether the concern is a factual error, an overbroad interpretation, a citation mismatch, or a broken link. Those problems call for different kinds of review.

A concise description with an original source is more useful than a general request to approve or reject an entire topic. Do not send confidential documents, account credentials, or sensitive personal information in an initial message.

Questions about the examples

The JSON examples in the developer section are fictional static files. There are no API accounts to activate, subscriptions to cancel, or live checks to troubleshoot. For questions about adapting the proposed contract, identify the field or example involved and explain the behavior you expected.

Source and attribution issues

Use the same address for a source-link correction, attribution question, or request concerning material on this site. Include enough detail to locate the relevant page and passage. FactAPI.com is independent of the external publishers discussed and cannot change their articles or records.

Before you write

Review the editorial policy for our evidence principles, the privacy page for email and browsing information, and the developer examples for the scope of the local demonstration.