Research integrity
Source watch: monitor corrections, updates, and retractions
Design a source-monitoring process that turns scholarly updates into reviewable actions for dependent claims.
03 FIELDNOTES / TOPIC
Academic sources
A focused reading path through The Evidence Journal. Scholarly evidence needs accurate identification, careful interpretation, and attention to later updates. Explore journal-article fact checks, bibliographic validation, and source-watch workflows that connect research to the claims depending on it.
How to use this collection
Follow the exact work and version, inspect the methods and relevant results, and match the strength of your wording to the evidence. Where specialized statistical or domain review is needed, say so. The collection is a guide to transparent reading and maintenance, not a claim that every paper has received a complete scientific audit.
Start with the Academic fact checks guide, then follow the fieldnotes below. All examples are illustrative and each article points to its own editorial source.
Research integrity
Academic fact checking: read beyond the abstract
A journal-article review workflow for tracing claims to methods, results, versions, and appropriate qualifications.
Citation quality
Citation checker: verify identity, accuracy, and support
Go beyond working links to inspect bibliographic identity, source passages, quotations, and the meaning of a citation.
Follow the claim. Find the evidence.
Go from a better question to a clearer evidence trail—one fieldnote at a time.